What motivation is
relevant to me?
Motivation is desire and
drive to strive for something someone wants. An example in an organisation is
usually bonuses. However, it does not have to be monetary factors that effect
motivation. It can simply be a working environment. For students, it may be
grades. Motivation tells us why people act in a particular way and why people
do what they do. Mullins
(2008) describes motivation
as why people behave in a certain way and the direction and persistence of
action.
The motivation theory I
have chosen related to me is McClellands achievement theory. This theory points
out that there are three categories that motivates people. These three motives
are achievement, affiliation and power. The first motive is achievement, this
is where someone has the desire to achieve and succeed. Typically, the person
with this motivated need will set long term goals that are testing for them.
They have to be a challenge for them, so they get a sense of achievement after
they have accomplished it. According to Montana
(2008) achievement motivation
is largely a theory for entrepreneurs because of the goal setting and
challenging tasks.
Affiliation is the need
for human interaction and relationships with other people. This type of person
may need to have friends and these characteristics in order to achieve, so a
specific environmental area will be a interactive one. There is a clear
advantage to this aspect, this is that they are likely to be a good team
player.
The last idea of
McClellands theory is power. This idea is to have a big influence on people and
be effective. There will also be a desired need to be a leader, therefore this
last motive is most likely to be linked with managers. Not just an organisation,
but even in a football team where the manager drives on there players. Law (2011) highlights that people
who need power, are most likely to be people who want to rise to the top of the
organisation.
I have chosen this
theory because I believe it relates to me the most and I need these three
categories in order to be motivated. I believe I need achievement in order to
be motivated because I need goals in my life in order try and be successful. I
like the idea of difficult challenges and ambitious goals because I have a
capacity for hard work. Affiliation is also needed in my life
to be constantly be motivated, this is because I think
that friends make me feel comfortable and content. The feeling that you
can contact others put me in a better mood which makes it feel easier to
be motivated. Another reason why McClelland’s theory is relevant to
me is because of the last factor, power. In some situations, I believe I need
power to keep me motivated, this is because in sports such as badminton, I like
to feel that I am a big influence in the team and that I am effective for the
team. Otherwise my confidence will not be as high as therefore, motivation is
lost.
Motivation for my degree course, why I am here? What has motivated you to get here and what will motivate you for the
next 2 – 3 years?
A time when I was de-motivated. Why I felt like this? How did I get more motivated?
A time where I was de-motivated
is mainly during A levels and when I first came to university I was slightly de-motivated.
This is because the results for my A levels was poor even though I felt I
worked extremely hard throughout the two years. But I also felt I would not get
into a university and therefore my aims were not going to be met.
Buckinghamshire New University was not my first choice and most of my friends
went to there first choice, so this saddened me a little too. However, I was
not de-motivated all throughout A levels, as there were signs I could
potentially achieve in some exams. I can link this back to Maslow's hierarchy
of needs and Hezrberg's theory. Maslow's
Hierarchy of needs says that we must fulfil each need in order, starting with
the first need to be motivated. This deals with the most obvious needs for
survival itself. It has five stages to this theory. These are shown in the
diagram. Pride (2011) defines this theory as a series of
human requirements in the order of their importance. I can link this back to my
de-motivation because even though I had physiological, safety and social needs.
I did not have esteem or self actualization needs. This is because after I put
in so much effort, but still failing to achieve the results I wanted, I lost
self esteem and confidence, and therefore I could not move up the hierarchy. In
this theory, you often move up and down the pyramid. At one point, I believe I
was at self esteem and self actualization sector because of a couple
encouraging results.
Another theory I can link
to being de-motivated is Herzberg's two factor theory. This is because
Hertzberg two factor motivation theory consists of two categories which both
analyse what makes you content or disgruntled at work. These two factors are
hygiene and motivation factors. Nelson
(2009) explains Hygiene
factors as the working conditions related to dissatisfaction caused by
discomfort, and the motivation factors as the working conditions related
satisfaction of the need of psychological growth. I can again relate this
theory to how I was de-motivated during a levels and after it. This is because
there were certain hygiene and motivation factors that made me de-motivated.
For example, a motivation factors is achievement, after getting my A level
results, there was not really a sense of achievement as I did not do as well as
I expected. For the hygiene factor, status was a little issue. This is because
my university was not highly ranked in the table compared to others and
therefore, I felt my status was lower than others.
In conclusion to this
blog, I found this topic intriguing. This is because I learnt a lot about what
I need in order to keep motivated and how different theories can link with each
other. I can also see how each theory can reflect on other peoples life, and
that different motivation theories will suit different people, as they may have
completely different goals.
Bibliography
Charnov, B.H and Montana, P.J. (2008) Management.
4th ed. New York: Barron's Educational Series, Inc.
Law, J. (2011) Business:
The Ultimate Resource. 3rd ed.
Mullins, L.J. (2008) Essentials
of Organisational Behaviour. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Quick, J.C and Nelson, D.L. (2011) Organizational
Behavior: Science, the Real World, and You. 7th ed. OH: South-Western
Cengage Learning.
Pride, W.M,
Hughes, R.J and Kapoo, J.R. (2011) Business.
11th ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment