Perception and Communication

Personal
experience
When I first attended university, I felt nervous going
into the first class as I did not know anyone and would not know how they would
react to me. Before I meet anyone new, I am usually very content and I tend to
sit back to observe how they would act before trying to make new friends. In
the first lecture, I saw a few people talking and my initial thoughts was that
they seemed to be a nuisance and that they had a big ego. They did not take
things as seriously as I thought they would and I also had the idea that they
was trying to take control of the class. My initial judgement came because they
seemed to be fairly loud and talkative. Appearance wise, they did not seem to be my sort of
friends and therefore, I did feel I wanted to make friends with them, this can
be classified as stereotyping. However, my initial thoughts was completely
wrong after a while and my thoughts are completely different to what they first
was. This is because they started talking to me and I got along with them fine.
They were extremely friendly and invited me to socialise with them. When it
came to the first assignment they were also hard working, which I did not
expect. So my initial perception was incorrect as they are now my best friends
at this university. To avoid making this judgement again, I will give people
the chance to talk to me and will not avoid anyone, I will also not judge them
on appearance or attitude.
Communication
Communication is
a vital factor in life. It is where two people exchange and share information,
this could be new information to one individual or just ones opinion. Foss
(2008) defines communication as a state where a source transmits a message to a
receiver. Having effective communication is can reduce perception problems, not
just in a work place of in society too. This is because better communication
can reduce conflict. In a working environment, communication is needed for high
productivity and for employees to know what is going on in the company.
Especially if it is group work. It is stated that more than 70% of a workers
time will be communicating.
University

Another to
improve communication to "keep the personal touch." This is because
students can value face to face communication with lectures highly. The idea of
this is for lecturers to have the conviction and ability to hold a two way
conversation so communication is effective. This will help universities because
students can become in contact with lecturers regularly and easily. The
university could also improve as students can express their opinions. This type
of communication can be referred to as an all channels network show below. The
opposite to a two way conversation is Handy's role culture. This can be
referred to as a "top down" communication style. Handys role culture
has been referred to as a greek temple, as shown below. Walker (2011) describes role culture as the role or job description
that is more vital the individual in the job. The top of temple is where the
more important decisions are made. The pillars are the functional units of an
organisation which follow orders from the top of the temple. When an
organisation is changing, this culture will be insecure as change will be
difficult in these types of organisations. Grint
(2005) claims that role cultures are usually found in bureaucracies.
The final way to
improve universities communication with students recommended from the article
will be to engage the people. The CIPD
here has identified three strong ways of employee engagement. These ways are
"having the opportunity to feed your views upwards; feeling well informed
about what is happening in your organisation; and believing your manager is
committed to the organisation." These ways can improve communication
betweens students and lecturers because students can make their opinion clear
straight to the lecturers or senior lecturers. A student expressing there views
is key because it can help improve results which would improve the organisation
as a whole. With students knowing what is happening in an organisation, there
can be a development of trust as nothing is hidden from them, therefore
communication will be effective and students feel more comfortable
communicating with the university. The last one can be related to a lecture,
where a lecturer is committed to teaching. From a students point of view,
knowing that a lecturer is committed and wanting to teach someone, relates very
well to the student, therefore communication between them is likely to improve.
Overall I feel
that perception and communication is most vital for an organisation to work
well. This is because the better communication is between employees and
managers and students and lecturers, the better the organisation will be. They
two groups of people can share the thoughts in order to improve the
organisation. I think that the university has done well with communicating with
students as I have been informed about most problems that come up. I can also
happily come up to a lecturer without hesitation. I do not believe that
lecturers have been stereotypical and perceived others as different even though
they may be a certain gender or race.
Bibliography
Grint, K. (2005) The Sociology Of Work:
Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hammond, J. (2011) Branding
Your Business. London: Kogan Page.
Littlejohn, W.S. and Foss,
K.A. (2008) Theories of Human Communication. 9th ed. Belmont, CA:
Kogan Page.
Walker, A. (2011) Organizational
Behaviour In Construction. 1st ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment